Burning In App Payment Forced Prohibition Act, Game Industry 'Yes' - Assembly Science

In-app billing is a hot potatoes that are a hot potato business law called forced prohibition or Google Sadness law.

This is the influence of international public opinion that the international public opinion requires a brake to forces the exclusive action of the huge enterprise and forced payment counter.

In particular, the prohibition law leads to the competition of billing-related companies, lowering the burden of game fees (30%), and has been positive for the combination of healthy digital market ecosystems.

** In-app billing forced prohibition law

According to the 6th game IT-related industry, the forced prohibition of the application bill, such as Google and Apple, is standing in front of the National Assembly.

This prohibited law ▲ App marketer business is forced to pay for its payment method ▲ Application for the app registration in the third-party market ▲ Delayed the app review, delayed and content unreasonable ▲ Developers, and discriminatory condition, restriction prohibition, etc.

The Prohibition Act has exceeded the last month, the National Assembly Science and Technology Information Communication Committee of the National Assembly Science and Technology Information and Communication Committee, and the legal judicial committee examination and the parliamentary procedure are left.

Recently, the US Apps Fairy Yi (CAF), which is opposed to Google and Apple's proprietary business behavior, visited the National Assembly and supported the prohibition law. The visit of the Apps Fairy Platinity is a lawsuit to prevent unfair acts of market operators in the United States and the EU, and becomes a sole because of its acceleration in the first time in our National Assembly, as the world's first commodity.

The ruling party has also seen a position to commit to the relevant bill. In addition, the Democratic Society (the National Assembly Science and Technology Information Broadcasting Communications Commission), the Democratic Party of the Democratic Institute of Applications, and the US App Fair Policy Policy Conference "on the 3rd Democratic Party, I could not assume it according to the end of the end. I will be assumed to be in the subtitle this month. "

The same day Mark view app fair generation officer (Senior Vice President of Match Group) is a leader in the book of Google In-app's payment. I think that it is a logical procurement to regulate the exclusive act of a large company. " I also had a comment.

Gaming system "Situation example of this" ... Expectation of fair opportunity to pay for the payment company

In-app billing enforcement law is a situation in which our game industry is also an example.

Rather, most of the game was the response that the political rights of the political rights were late. The game industry has already paid 30% of the fee under the shade of Market Market, since a long time ago, and has lived like a peasant.

The commissions and billing policies of existing markets were steadily steadily, regardless of the size of the game company. In this atmosphere, Kim Tae-jin, who was an ENC Soft founder, was a great sympathy in the meantime that since the popularization of mobile game since the popularization of mobile game.

Kim Tae-jin, NCs Soft, a new announcement of November 2014, "Mobile company was not developed as a developer, but it was fought as a developer," he said, "It seems that the peasant age came. In the past, I wanted to do what I wanted to do, but now the Publisher (distribution) company has a profit. The development side has come to take 20-30% earnings. "

Although it will be different from the game, the share of the Google Market is about half of our criteria. Because of this, it was a common opinion of the game industry officials to see Google's notice. In addition, some of the games were claimed that Apple Market is not only Google, and it is not exposed to popularity of popularity and sales ranking.

This prohibition law is also positive in that it is possible to provide a fair opportunity for electronic payment agencies (PG), and the liver payment service. NHN Phako and Exalara are considered to be a representative beneficiary company.

NHN Phako is a starting Google in 2017, and it is a prospect that Apple offers a payment service to Apple. NHN Paco is an advantage that it is accustomed to domestic game users.

In addition, Exolla is a set of more than 700 global payment methods to more than 200 countries that are a settlement solution that is a settlement solution that has been optimized for game users who want to simultaneous domestic and overseas markets. The company was attracted attention by building a game of game and marketing and investment platforms for many years, and has been attracted attention, and has been actively actively working with large games through a Mobile PC interlocking 3-party payment system.

Individual officials shall look at the reason why the forced prohibition of the In-app billing is called the anti-Google Prostric Act. Google, such as market operators, such as Market, etc., but in the position of market influence and compulsory systems, "I do not want to make it even more not publicly disclosed the aggregation of popularity and sales ranking that each game person is sensitive to each game."

Another official said, "This prohibition bill passes through the National Assembly, with a fair market entry opportunity for billing-related companies," It is not monopolized, but it is a healthy market ecosystem composition, "If you can choose a payment company, The profitability improvement of the app company is also expected. The reason why the game is not only the game, the reason for the presentation law, "he added."